GOP Keeps Obamacare ‘Fragile’ as Trump Nears 100 Days

It’s unlikely any repeal or replacement of the Affordable Care Act can be achieved anytime soon, leaving markets where Americans buy individual Obamacare policies in a “fragile” state, perhaps for another year or longer. “The fragility (of the market) will continue for some time,” says Dr. Mark McClellan, director of Duke’s Margolis Center for Health Policy and a former top health official in the George W. Bush administration.

Read More in Forbes

Is Fight to Repeal/Replace Affordable Care Act Dead?

Dr. Kevin Schulman says President Obama is often blamed for skyrocketing health care costs even though it long preceded the Affordable Care Act and affects everyone, not just those who have insurance through the law. Yet Schulman doesn’t see any serious attempts to address that core issue among the health care policy proposals floating around Washington. “It doesn’t seem like a lot of people on the Hill have agreement about what the problems are,” he says. “Coming to a consensus on a solution is even more challenging. I’m not optimistic that they can get there.”

Read More on PolitiFact

The GOP Effort To Repeal Obamacare Appears Dead, For Now

David Anderson, an expert in insurance plan design at the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, explains how under the GOP plan insurers would use their newfound freedom to exclude potentially costly customers. “The first stream of product design will be aimed to cover very little,” he says. “They will be very narrow networks with no major academic medical centers involved; their benefits will be designed to drive away sick people with chronic conditions.”

Read More in The Los Angeles Times

 

Sesame Street’s New Muppet With Autism Is a Reminder That Congress Can’t Pass the AHCA

“It’s a challenging moment for the one in 68 children and millions of American adults who are on the autism spectrum. President Donald Trump and Republicans’ proposed repeal of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, with the American Health Care Act (AHCA) would eliminate the law’s Medicaid expansion, which serves many people with autism,” writes Geraldine Dawson, director of the Duke Center for Autism and Brain Development and president of the International Society for Autism Research.

Read More on Fortune

A Budget for the People?

“The core purpose of federal taxing and spending is to provide the American people with the government services and public goods they need, want, and deserve. The new administration’s budget, if we can even call it that, does nothing of the sort,” writes Mark Paul, an economist and postdoctoral associated at the Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity.

Read More on Medium

Terror Or No Health Care Will Kill You Just As Dead

“The best evidence shows that the average morbidity benefit, or reduction of the incidence or severity of disease, associated with gaining health insurance coverage for one year would equal 3.7 to 6.8 days of healthy life,” states a 2014 commentary written by Christopher Conover, a research scholar at Duke’s Center for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, that’s cited in this column.

Read More in the Chicago Sun-Times

Know the Basics of Why Obamacare Stumbled Before Adopting Trumpcare

“Of course, it’s too much to ask these days for a reasoned discussion of the underlying economics of health care in Washington. However, without such a discussion, the most likely result will increase the cost of health care to you and your family. Real reform will require a hard look at the economics of our health care system — its strengths and its failings,” writes Dr. Kevin Schulman, a professor of medicine.

Read More in The Plain Dealer

Cuts To EPA, NIH Budgets Would Hurt Local Economy

President Donald Trump’s proposed federal budget includes cuts to two federal agencies that could make a noticeable dent in the Triangle economy if it wins congressional approval. Dr. Nancy C. Andrews, dean of the School of Medicine, says in a statement she hopes Congress rejects any reduction of NIH funding and funding for other programs critical to people’s health and well-being. “Everywhere you turn, there is clear evidence of the impact of science and biomedical research on human lives,” she says.

Read More in The News & Observer

A Matter of Life and Death

“During the campaign, Donald Trump promised to repeal and replace Obamacare with something “terrific,” something that would cover “everybody.” This new proposal is opposite. In the service of cutting taxes for a few, it will shorten lives for many. America must reject it,” writes Mark Paul, postdoctoral associate at the Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity, and a colleague.

Read More on Inside Sources

Boiling Down the GOP Health Care Plan

“In summary, this bill is a tax cut for high income folks that is funded by cuts to the Medicare program as compared to the ACA new baseline. In addition, it provides a fundamental change of the federal governments financial commitment for Medicaid which weakens the safety net we have, while wiping out coverage gains from Medicaid expansion,” writes health policy scholar Don Taylor.

Read More on the FreeForAll Blog

GOP Health Care Plan: ‘Seems DOA in 24 Hours’

Health policy scholar Don Taylor talks about the new Republican plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (7 minute mark). “My first thought was, ‘It took you guys six years to come up with this?’ And it seems DOA in 24 hours. I think what it shows is there’s really never been a consensus in the Republican Party about what to do about health care policy other than to counter-punch the Affordable Care Act.”

Watch on TWC’s “Capital Tonight”

 

As Trump Targets Carbon Rules, Green Groups Promise a Legal Fight

With President Trump poised to issue an executive order aimed at undoing a key pillar of the Obama administration’s climate-change agenda, environmental activist groups have joined forces for what they say will be a tooth-and-nail legal battle that could drag on for years. “Altering a final rule, like the Clean Power Plan, isn’t as simple as the stroke of a pen. It will likely require the EPA to undertake a new rulemaking process including public notice and comment that could last a few years,” says Tim Profeta, director of the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions

Read More in The Washington Times